When volatility rises, how should grid parameters change?
Calibrate the band, step spacing and maximum exposure of a grid from volatility data, not by feel.

The implicit assumption behind a grid
A grid performs well in ranging markets, and it implicitly assumes price will oscillate within a predictable band. When volatility rises materially, price is more likely to trend, and the grid keeps adding in the direction of the trend, turning into a directional exposure.
Criterion one: calibrate step spacing with ATR
Step spacing should match current volatility. A usable starting point is one ATR per step. If the original parameter was set at half an ATR in a low-volatility regime, using it now doubles the number of steps and pushes both fill frequency and position size beyond what you intended.
Criterion two: cap the total number of steps with band width
The upper and lower edges of the band should reference genuine structural levels rather than being spaced evenly. Mark the highs and lows of the past three months first, then define the band from them. Band width divided by step spacing gives the maximum number of steps; multiply that by the size per step to get the strategy's maximum exposure — and that figure must sit inside the drawdown you can tolerate.
Criterion three: let a trend filter decide whether to run it
Set a simple activation condition: pause the grid when price closes outside the band for several consecutive sessions, or when the gap between a short and a long moving average exceeds a threshold. Brent crude is a good example — its range from 5 to 14 October was 100.22 to 106.06 dollars, about 6%, and a one-way leg like that is exactly the environment a grid should avoid.
Three common execution errors
First, adding in the opposite direction mid-trend because "price is already high", which replaces directional judgement with the grid. Second, running without a maximum exposure cap, letting the number of steps inflate with volatility. Third, treating the grid's floating loss as unrealised and ignoring its real effect on margin usage — once usage approaches the liquidation level, the strategy loses the room it needs to keep operating.
The order of adjustment
Adjust in this sequence: reduce exposure first, widen step spacing second, redefine the band last. Cutting exposure immediately lowers risk, while widening spacing and redefining the band need backtesting support and should not be improvised while positions are open.